Partnership For Learning
Featured Media Featured Media
Subscribe to E-News

Teaching Science Teachers to be Leaders

A big part of teaching is about knowing how to ask the right questions.

But what if the subject you’re teaching revolves around just that, the pursuit of more and more questions?

Welcome to science class, a period some of us may remember as an adventure into the innards of frogs, the Milky Way and everything in between. Science class today still requires students to know facts and formulas but they are also increasingly asked to seek their own answers to fundamental questions about how the world around them works.

“It is a much more active process of learning with teachers serving as highly skilled guides through a rigorous process of scientific inquiry. To do it well requires teachers that are passionate and incredibly knowledgeable and comfortable with the science content,” said Carolyn Landel, project director for the North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership (NCOSP) at Western Washington University.

Nationally and locally, science education has long languished due to inadequate instructional materials, ineffective teaching strategies, and particularly at the elementary level, insufficient preparation in science to teach it well. Exacerbating these challenges, national and state standards include far more topics than students can learn over the course of their school experience, according to Landel (the State Board of Education and the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction are currently involved in revising Washington’s science standards and will complete their work in December of 2008).

So Landel and others brought together 28 school districts and five institutions of higher education in an innovative partnership to develop a network of “teacher leaders” with deep knowledge of science, how children learn, and how to plan effective instruction to support student learning. These teacher leaders are also coached on how to more effectively collaborate with their peers as well as serve as catalysts for change in science teaching throughout their school and district.

Thanks to Landel, NCOSP, and the hard work of the teacher leaders and their administrators, student learning in Northwestern Washington has increased dramatically.

According to Landel, the entire program is firmly grounded in the research surrounding “How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice”—a scientific, research-based approach to teaching and learning. “What distinguishes the partnership is its relentless commitment to translating research findings into practical strategies and tools that teachers and administrators can use to support their daily work -- helping every child learn.”

Founded in 2002 by former NASA Astronaut and Western Washington University science professor Pinky Nelson, NCOSP was conceived as a partnership between higher education and school districts to simultaneously improve the preparation of future teachers and the quality of the science programs and science instruction in schools.

A grant from the National Science Foundation awarded in September 2003 provided external resources to help the partnership take form and to conduct careful studies to monitor its impact. Nelson and Landel assembled a staff and launched the first Summer Academy with 160 local science teachers in 2004.

The teachers were offered a variety of tailored incentives for their participation in the NCOSP program. All were awarded a stipend for taking the classes, and many elected to receive graduate credits that could be used to complete a master’s degree. Still others applied portions of their NCOSP experience to their pursuit of national board certification.

“Each partner district had to decide which of their teachers would participate,” said Landel. “They know their staff; they know the needs and concerns of their school. We relied on their expertise to select those that would become teacher leaders.” The result was a broad sampling of teachers with diverse backgrounds; a very representative slice of the state.

Using expertise from different groups is another hallmark of NCOSP. “The teachers bring a wealth of knowledge about teaching, schools, and children. The higher education faculty has expertise in science content and research. When these groups work together, everyone learns,” said Nelson.

The first 160 local teachers (90 from elementary, 40 from middle and 30 from high school), met for a two-week immersion during the summer and experienced a deep-dive into the current research on learning and effective science instruction. Through structured scientific investigations, teachers were confronted with many questions. The facilitators of those discussions provided few answers -- the teachers did the hard work of constructing the answers themselves.

“Across all grade levels we need teachers to recognize science as a dynamic body of knowledge that changes based on the best available evidence. There is no better way to understand that idea than to experience it first hand. Teachers quickly realize that it’s the evidence their students generate and the questions they explore that will help them learn science.”

“My students have had to get comfortable with seeking answers to questions they generate,” said Roger Hasper, an NCOSP teacher leader at North Bellingham Elementary. “As I increased my use of questioning strategies and inquiry students started to take more responsibility for their thinking across all areas of the curriculum.”

 

After participating in the Summer Academy, the teacher leaders received continued support through regional Learning Community Forums, which met monthly for the first three years of the program. NCOSP’s teacher leaders also receive additional support from Teachers on Special Assignment (or TOSAs; teacher leaders who take a one-year sabbatical to support partnership activities across all districts). TOSAs help observe and facilitate ongoing meetings between teacher leaders, their teaching colleagues, and their school principal.

Squalicum High School Principal David Engle in the Bellingham School District has developed a deeper respect for the challenge of good science teaching and has seen significant improvement in his school’s science instruction since one of his staff became a teacher leader. This teacher leader has worked with other teachers in her building to share what she’s learning, increasing the impact on instruction across multiple classrooms.

“Students are more highly engaged in our science curriculum because of these instructional changes,” said Engle. “I've seen my teachers really address the misconceptions that students bring to class with them about basic science ideas and I've seen a much more reflective approach to science instruction from the teachers most involved in the NCOSP work.”


Engle’s school isn’t the only one that has benefited. Two years ago, only 36 percent of eighth-grade students at Nooksack Valley Middle School in Everson were proficient on the science WASL. In 2007, that number rose to 73 percent in classrooms taught by NCOSP teachers. The results at Nooksack Valley Elementary School were equally striking. The scores for fifth graders in NCOSP classrooms jumped from near the state average of 36 percent two years ago to almost 90 percent this year.


“All of our schools’ test results are now significantly higher than state averages – despite demographics that would predict otherwise. We are confident that we will continue to improve,” said Mark Johnson, Nooksack Valley Superintendent.

With the success of the first 160 teachers in 2007, NCOSP added an additional 250 teachers. This time, however, the new teachers were provided professional development guidance by the teacher leaders (all past NCOSP participants) at their school. This sort of collaborative model that uses the expertise of teacher leaders is exactly what Landel hopes will catch on in each of the participating districts and perhaps beyond.


“There are many more teachers across the state that could benefit from this type of program,” said Landel. “The next question we need to sit down, study, and ask ourselves is, ‘What does it take to build other partnerships like this that benefit teachers and students and how do we implement them to support broader statewide changes?’”

In the science of teaching science, the questions never really end.


To learn more about the North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, visit www.ncosp.wwu.edu or email Carolyn Landel at Carolyn.Landel@wwu.edu.


For updates on Washington’s revision of state science standards visit the State Board of Education’s website.


To learn more about a complimentary statewide effort to improve science education in Washington State visit LASER’s website.

 

 



Holding Back Vital Change

 

House Bill would deny students the math necessary to be college ready


Representative Dave Quall
has introduced and will hold a hearing Monday, Feb. 4 on HB 3299, a bill to reverse the state's requirement for a third year of high school math. This would be a major step backward. The requirement is already not likely to be implemented until 2013. Reversing the requirement would diminish important momentum and extend the pattern of awarding diplomas to students who are not prepared for a two-year community or technical college or other higher education.

 


 

Two Legislators Focus on Ending Washington's Math Teacher Shortage

 

Why can’t we offer more math to high school students? What’s holding us back from doing away with remediation—those costly pre-college classes half of community college students need even though they’ve just received a high school diploma? The answer, more often than not, is that we simply don’t have enough qualified math teachers.

 

Two legislators are stepping up this session to squarely address the challenge. Rep. Pat Sullivan and Sen. Rodney Tom have both introduced bills that would set in motion a process to quantify the shortage of math and science teachers; unify, strengthen and accelerate recruitment efforts; and introduce financial incentives to attract new math and science teachers into the profession. The House bill (HB 2809) was broadly supported in last week’s public hearing. The Senate bill (SB 6781) is slated to be heard February 6.

The Professional Educators Standards Board (PESB) has shown a strong commitment to work on this issue, as well. PESB recently released the preliminary results of a statewide survey of school districts that reported impending teacher shortages in meeting the new third year of math requirement. This was an encouraging step forward but gathering accurate data on this topic remains challenging. And when it comes to things such as pay incentives—only the legislature can pave the way. Recent public opinion research has shown strong support for using pay incentives as a way to attract qualified math and science teachers, even if it means they will be paid more than teachers of other important subjects.

We applaud these two legislators for stepping up and offering proactive solutions to the statewide shortage of math teachers.

 

For other updates on important education-related legislation please visit our blog, The Hall Monitor.

 


Comments

As a school administrator

As a school administrator who supervised science teachers, the participation in NCOSP has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my career. My teachers have included me in all of their professional development activities, using "lesson study" as the model. I have been made to feel a part of the team and my role of supervision has been more like a collaboration with them than an inspection of their work.I have observed many science lessons and have participated in all reflective debriefing sessions. I was even asked to teach a lesson to a AP physics class. Quite a challenge for an old social studies teacher!

NCOSP has transformed my practice

My participation in the NCOSP over the past four years has effectively transformed my practice. As a co-facilitator in the content immersions I was able to reflect repeatedly on my learning and teaching. By becoming a more reflective and collaborative practitioner I was able to leverage my own experiences and NCOSP tool chest to help reform the elementary science methods sequence at Western Washington University. Now as our Woodring students prepare to enter the teaching world their experiences with Lesson Study, Curriculum Topic Study and How People Learn not only singularly inform their practice but also give them tremendous advantage as they compete for jobs. Our pre-service teachers have a repertoire of research-based approaches for effective science instruction. For instance, they have strategies to make science content intellectually engaging. They are able to continuously monitor student understanding. They understand the importance of students organizing, relating and applying their scientific knowledge. And they value collaborative practice. The positive “snowball” effect of NCOSP is only beginning. As these students enter professional practice I believe we will see tremendous growth in quality instruction and collaboration throughout the educational community

NCOSP

As an administrator of science programs for public school districts and buildings at the regional level, I have been thrilled with the support provided for our teachers by WWU faculty and staff as part of the NCOSPartnership. The leadership skills being acquired by the NCOSP teachers is now supporting the other good work in science ed reform going on in our region, in a deliberate, highly personalized to the building and staff, job-embedded way. Thanks!

NCOSP teacher leader

I agree that we have a huge challenge in finding the time and money to expand and sustain the NCOSP learnings but we can't overlook what we've been given over the last four years- a wealth of information, research, materials and professional connections. We will continue to intigrate our learning in our classroom and support other teachers at our school. I find it amazing the forsight and insight NCOSP project director, manager and all the staff demonstrated in presenting the best practices in science education and reform.

As a TOSA for NCOSP this

As a TOSA for NCOSP this year, I have had the opportunity to visit Professional Learning Communities in action at elementary schools around the region. I have watched PLCs struggle and succeed with new questions about student learning while always working on finding ways to improve student achievement in science. Given the input of the NCOSP and collaborating at a building level has again and again proved to be a powerful tools affecting change in classrooms around the region. An interesting trend that I have noticed recently is the development, at the building level, of new teacher leaders in schools. With the guidance of current and past NCOSP teacher leaders, new leaders are emerging to carry on the use of the strategies and tools that allow a teacher to use best practice when teaching science. This is important to a building system because it means that science best practice is not based on a “personality” that could move on next year. I believe that this trend, along with continued administrative support, could be steps in developing sustainability for the lessons learned during the NCOSP grant.

NCOSP

As a teacher leader at the elementary level that participated in the NCOSP training for the last 4 years, I am sometimes amazed at the changes I have made in my teaching. I thought that I had a good background in science, but the immersion experiences caused me to question what I thought I knew, and gave me a broader understanding of not just science, but of how people learn. Even though much of this information has been out there for those with the time and inclination to research it, in our busy lives we often don't have the time. NCOSP researched and condensed the information that we needed to become better teachers. The process that they used to teach the teachers was a model that we learned through first hand experience and then could apply to our own classrooms. NCOSP gave me the support to change my own teaching, and then the tools to go out and help other teachers in my district. Our district has gone from a textbook based program to an inquiry model where teachers feel comfortable with helping students find their own answers to questions, rather than giving information to be memorized, but not really understood. In todays world we can't afford to have students that only learn to memorize and not think. NCOSP has set the example for what professional development should really look like to be effective. The vision that they have affects not just a few teachers at a grade level, but many teachers and districts across all grade levels, K-through pre-service teachers. The last four years with NCOSP have been an exciting time in my professional career and have helped me move forward more than anything else in which I have participated.

NCOSP article

Teachers struggle daily with making sure what they are teaching their students is effective, is correct, and based on the best pedagogy on how students learn. It is very difficult for teachers to wade through all the educational research, to determine which inservice, classes or workshops will be the most effective, and to have peer support that follows a teacher into their classroom once that door shuts when the bell rings. NCOSP, the North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, cuts through the incredible amount of information that is out there on what constitutes good science instruction. Throughout the last 4 years, as a classroom teacher and as a Teacher on Special Assignment for the NCOSP grant, I have constantly found that the opportunities provided by the grant cuts to the chase for science teachers, and offers the best research-based information for my classroom. From instructon, to collaboration, to assessment, the resources offered by NCOSP connects it all in a viable, practical way that has changed the way I teach science to middle school students. Science in particular has very specific needs and requirements, involving expensive and/or confusing instructional materials and inadequate teacher preparation particularly at the elementary level. Secondary teachers struggle with "how to teach" a too-large list of standards and specific grade level requirements. With NCOSP, these issues are very effectively dealt with. Teacher "leaders" have learned how to weed through what students should, and can, know about science at their specific grade levels. They share this knowledge with their professional learning communities. This network of “teacher leaders” with deep knowledge of science, how children learn, and how to plan effective instruction to support student learning is at the root of the success of NCOSP, a true partnership in helping students achieve in science.

NCOSP article

Teachers struggle daily with making sure what they are teaching their students is effective, is correct, and based on the best pedagogy on how students learn. It is very difficult for teachers to wade through all the educational research, to determine which inservice, classes or workshops will be the most effective, and to have peer support that follows a teacher into their classroom once that door shuts when the bell rings. NCOSP, the North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, cuts through the incredible amount of information that is out there on what constitutes good science instruction. Throughout the last 4 years, as a classroom teacher and as a Teacher on Special Assignment for the NCOSP grant, I have constantly found that the opportunities provided by the grant cuts to the chase for science teachers, and offers the best research-based information for my classroom. From instructon, to collaboration, to assessment, the resources offered by NCOSP connects it all in a viable, practical way that has changed the way I teach science to middle school students. Science in particular has very specific needs and requirements, involving expensive and/or confusing instructional materials and inadequate teacher preparation particularly at the elementary level. Secondary teachers struggle with "how to teach" a too-large list of standards and specific grade level requirements. With NCOSP, these issues are very effectively dealt with. Teacher "leaders" have learned how to weed through what students should, and can, know about science at their specific grade levels. They share this knowledge with their professional learning communities. This network of “teacher leaders” with deep knowledge of science, how children learn, and how to plan effective instruction to support student learning is at the root of the success of NCOSP, a true partnership in helping students achieve in science.

NCOSP Learnigns and Opportunities

The NCOSP has been quite successful at developing and testing hypotheses related to powerful teaching and learning of science throughout the NWESD and OESD regions. It has been truly refreshing to see scientists, at the university and K-12 practitioner levels, work together to apply learnings systemically. I have never before seen a group so able to separate personal vestment from outcomes—they have truly seemed just as pleased to disprove a hypothesis as to prove it. The NCOSP impacts on student achievement has been remarkable and the cultural changes within schools and districts inspiring—as a result of the professional development coupled with job-embedded supports. The challenge now will be to identify the resources (time and money) necessary to expand and sustain the NCOSP learnings within schools/districts. School systems are so under-funded given the ever growing set of expectations—this is not likely without some additional support. The good news is deployment of the learnings will be less expensive than the research required to develop and prove them. I just hope that future NCOSP informed deployments permit meaningful engagement of science educators and administrators—in professional development and job-embedded supports. Too many times I have seen successful pilots/programs fail during system deployment because the job-embedded supports could not be funded. If we truly want to improve student science performance of all students we must recognize that investment in staff is prerequisite and we must be willing to reconsider the way in which we schedule staff and student time—consistent with the NCOSP indicators.

Teaching Science Teachers to be Leaders

Thanks to all the teachers that have already posted comments to our NCOSP story. We hope others will share their own-the-ground feedback as well.

Teacher on Special Assignment Perspective (another TOSA)

I agree with Shannon's inspired description of what we get to see every day in our partner schools. Our teacher leaders have the pedagogical knowledge and leadership skills to support their colleagues as they engage in this practice of questioning, researching, and then intentionally implementing and critiquing their curriculum. We are so excited to see this collaboration continue and grow! The learning of these school-based communities will hopefully take root and truly change teaching culture! Of course the financial supports that are provided by both partner districts and the partnership's grant make finding time for teachers to collaborate far easier. So as funding for the collaboration and learning shifts next year to rely even more on partner districts, we are keeping our eyes and our ears open to find ways of maintaining not just the school-based professional learning communities, but also our partnership-wide communications, sharing, and learning.

Teacher on Special Assignment perspective

Working as a Teacher on Special Assignment for NCOSP in the last funded year for the North Cascade and Olympic Science Partnership has been challenging as well as inspiring. This year our work is focused primarily on ensuring the emerging science professional learning communities, led by teacher leaders, are able to continue after the support provided by NCOSP is no longer available. This means that we are out in schools, working with teacher leaders, their teaching colleagues, and their administrators on a regular basis. What we see in classrooms and buildings in our partnership is indeed inspiring. NCOSP teacher leaders have focused their vision of effective science instruction and are including others in that vision. Teacher leaders are using what they have learned in the last four years about instruction and leadership and finding that they are capable and comfortable providing job embedded professional development to their colleagues. The excitement in schools where real professional learning communities are forming is obvious as we hear on a regular basis how invigorating it is to focus on student learning with ones' colleagues within the building. The challenge for the partnership is to make sure we are leaving enough supports in place, in schools and in districts, that our newly formed professional learning communities will not lose their momentum in the future. The question we are still trying to answer is, how do we ensure sustainability?