Don't know much about history? Don't know much about geography?
By maureen on 27 Feb |
0 comments
On Monday, I attended a State
Board of Education work session on the components of a meaningful
high school diploma. And though I’m sure this wasn’t the intention, the
meeting came off as a bit of a death match between subjects, each vying
for their place in
But what about social studies?
Over the years, social studies has
transformed into a proverbial catch-all to include everything from world history
to
Confused? I bet the students are.
Social studies is clearly a problem and one that we may
not realize the consequences of ignoring. Just yesterday, I read USA
Today and New
York Times articles reporting a widespread lack of historical literacy
amongst today’s high school students. Apparently among 1,200 students
nationally surveyed, only 52 percent could identify a historical theme from the
book “1984” and only 51 percent knew that McCarthyism focused on communism.
Unfortunately, social studies is exactly the place
students make the connections between Miller’s “The Crucible”
and McCarthyism, and Orwell’s “1984”
and current Homeland Security. Sure, students could “get by” without
these historical connections—but the State Board’s mission in revising the
diploma is to ensure that students don’t just “get by,” they “do well.”
By requiring students to take more and richer social studies
curriculum, we give them the keys to orient themselves within history and
society at large. In classes like American history and world cultures,
I certainly found connections between the past and present that made laws more
understandable and current events make more sense.
All students should have this chance, but as a state and an
education system, it is up to us to make it a priority. Let’s hope the
State Board does |
||







